About this item
- Men's razor refills have 5 anti-friction blades in each cartridge
- Features a Precision Trimmer for hard-to-reach areas
- Lubricant strips shield your skin from both sides while you shave
The Gillette Fusion5 ProShield men's razor blade refills feature five anti-friction blades for a close shave with less tug and pull. These refills feature Gillette's thinnest, finest blades. ProShield blades have soothing lubrication before and after the blade for a close shave with less irritation. One razor blade refill provides up to a month of shaves. Fusion5 ProShield men's refills fit all Fusion5 & Fusion5 Power razors (formerly called Fusion ProGlide). Package contains four refill blade cartridges.
Hair Type: All Hair Types
Number of blades: 5
Care and Cleaning: Rinse Clean
Package Quantity: 4
Item Number (DPCI): 049-06-1249
If the item details above aren’t accurate or complete, we want to know about it. Report incorrect product info.
Most recent reviews
Awesome blades and worth the $$$$.
5 out of 5 stars
Docshave — 10 months ago
These blades are awesome. I know the price may scare some. But I shave 3 Times a week in the shower and one blade lasts me 3 months. Totally worth the money.see moreof the reviewer's review
My husband is so happy with his new face
5 out of 5 stars
sherabbit36 — 10 months ago
my husband was shaving the other day with some razor and he was struggling, i pulled this razor out for him and he said he felt like he had a new facesee moreof the reviewer's review
Not better than the original Fusion
(would not recommend)
1 out of 5 stars
RealityCheck123 — 1 year ago
Additional lubricant strip tends to make the blades skate over, rather than cut, beard growth. Not worth the additional cost.see moreof the reviewer's review
Very close, comfortable, shave.
4 out of 5 stars
Derosacamp — 1 year ago
reviewer received free item
I have been using this blade for years. Close comfortable shave. Prefer it over electric razor. One blade lasts for weeks. [This review was collected as part of a promotion.]see moreof the reviewer's review