About this item
Highlights
- Whilst Shakespearean drama provides eloquent calls to war, more often than not these are undercut or outweighed by compelling appeals to peaceful alternatives conveyed through narrative structure, dramatic context and poetic utterance.
- Author(s): Robert White
- 304 Pages
- Literary Criticism, Shakespeare
Description
About the Book
Throughout his career Shakespeare, although steeped in expert knowledge of military matters, weighted his plays towards a desire for peaceBook Synopsis
Whilst Shakespearean drama provides eloquent calls to war, more often than not these are undercut or outweighed by compelling appeals to peaceful alternatives conveyed through narrative structure, dramatic context and poetic utterance. Placing Shakespeare's works in the history of pacifist thought, Robert White argues that Shakespeare's plays consistently challenge appeals to heroism and revenge and reveal the brutal futility of war. White also examines Shakespeare's interest in the mental states of military officers when their ingrained training is tested in love relationships. In imagery and themes, war infiltrates love, with problematical consequences, reflected in Shakespeare's comedies, histories and tragedies alike. Challenging a critical orthodoxy that military engagement in war is an inevitable and necessary condition, White draws analogies with the experience of modern warfare, showing the continuing relevance of Shakespeare's plays which deal with basic issues of war and peace that are still evident.Review Quotes
White (Univ. of Western Australia), author of Pacificism in English Literature: Minstrels of Peace (2008), argues in Shakespeare against War that Shakespeare's works should be read as part of a pacifist tradition. This volume examines plays that have war as a central part of the setting and plot as well as plays that have topics of war as an undercurrent. White asserts that, even if the plays include speeches that are noted for their stirring of martial emotions, the plays, as a whole, provide an anti-war perspective. This perspective is achieved by conveying most military figures "in an ambiguous and critically distanced light" and by detailing the damage that war causes to innocents caught in its sphere (p. 13). Organizing Shakespeare's plays into two main sections, "Men at War" and "Love and War," White contends that, while the plays demonstrate Shakespeare's knowledge of war terminology, they indicate a "strong preference for peace" (p. 18). According to White, in place of war Shakespeare offers the alternatives of forgiveness, pardon, and mercy. Overall, Shakespeare against War is well argued with interesting and persuasive readings of the plays.
Summing Up: Recommended.--K. K. Smith, University of South Carolina "CHOICE"In a world where the humanities are under attack, Robert White's Shakespeare Against War is a reminder of the crucial importance of literary studies: ranging generously across the playwright's work, it invites us, as denizens of a burning planet whose leaders seem committed to endless war, to re-read Shakespeare as a fierce interrogator of militaristic values.--Michael Neill, University of Auckland