About this item
Highlights
- Reinterpreting the roots of twentieth-century American labor law and politics, Ruth O'Brien argues that it was not New Deal Democrats but rather Republicans of an earlier era who developed the fundamental principles underlying modern labor policy.
- Author(s): Ruth O'Brien
- 336 Pages
- Political Science, Labor & Industrial Relations
Description
About the Book
Workers' Paradox: The Republican Origins of New Deal Labor Policy, 1886-1935Book Synopsis
Reinterpreting the roots of twentieth-century American labor law and politics, Ruth O'Brien argues that it was not New Deal Democrats but rather Republicans of an earlier era who developed the fundamental principles underlying modern labor policy. By examining a series of judicial rulings from the first three decades of the century, she demonstrates that the emphasis on establishing the procedural rights of workers that is usually associated with the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 actually emerged over a decade earlier, in the Republican-formulated labor legislation of the 1920s.O'Brien's findings underscore a paradox within the foundation of labor policy and the development of liberalism in the United States. The leaders of the liberal state created a strict regulatory framework for organized labor only after realizing that the mainstream labor movement's capacity for collective power threatened to undermine individualism and classlessness in American society. In other words, O'Brien argues, the individualism that accounts for the overall weakness of the liberal state also produced America's statist labor policy.
Review Quotes
ÝA¨n important study of the contributions of Progressive Republicanism to the New Deal and the formation of the modern American state.
"American Historical Review"
ÝI¨t is certain to prompt serious thought and reflection.
"American Studies"
ÝThe book¨ will be read with profit by those interested in the history of organized labor and of the New Deal.
"Journal of Economic History"
[A]n important study of the contributions of Progressive Republicanism to the New Deal and the formation of the modern American state.
"American Historical Review"
[I]t is certain to prompt serious thought and reflection.
"American Studies"
[The book] will be read with profit by those interested in the history of organized labor and of the New Deal.
"Journal of Economic History"
Successfully encourages readers to examine critically the state Americans often forgot they had created.
"Labor History"
This is an intriguing and deftly argued book.
"Law and History Review"