Foreshadows of the Law - by Donald E Lively (Hardcover)
About this item
Highlights
- The Supreme Court has final authority in determining what the Constitution means.
- About the Author: DONALD E. LIVELY is a Professor of Law at the University of Toledo College of Law.
- 200 Pages
- Freedom + Security / Law Enforcement, Constitutional
Description
About the Book
The Supreme Court has final authority in determining what the Constitution means. The Court's findings have not, however, always been final. Lively focuses on several landmark dissenting opinions--resisted initially--later redefining the meaning of the Constitution. Each opinion arises from a rich historical context and involves constitutional issues of pointed significance. Vivid descriptions of some of the colorful personalities behind the opinions add appeal. Lively conveys the evolutionary and dynamic nature of the law demonstrating the relationship between present and past understanding of the Constitution. He describes the competitive nature of constitutional development and identifies the relevance of factors including subjective preference, values, vying theories, and ideologies.
The role of the Court, is addressed as are the federal government's relationship to the states and their citizens; slavery; property rights; substantive due process; freedom of speech; and the right to be left alone. This is a clearly presented and highly instructive consideration of how the Constitution's interpretation has been fashioned over time with important insights relevant to today's Court and contemporary cases.
Book Synopsis
The Supreme Court has final authority in determining what the Constitution means. The Court's findings have not, however, always been final. Lively focuses on several landmark dissenting opinions--resisted initially--later redefining the meaning of the Constitution. Each opinion arises from a rich historical context and involves constitutional issues of pointed significance. Vivid descriptions of some of the colorful personalities behind the opinions add appeal. Lively conveys the evolutionary and dynamic nature of the law demonstrating the relationship between present and past understanding of the Constitution. He describes the competitive nature of constitutional development and identifies the relevance of factors including subjective preference, values, vying theories, and ideologies.
The role of the Court, is addressed as are the federal government's relationship to the states and their citizens; slavery; property rights; substantive due process; freedom of speech; and the right to be left alone. This is a clearly presented and highly instructive consideration of how the Constitution's interpretation has been fashioned over time with important insights relevant to today's Court and contemporary cases.Review Quotes
?As a law professor and as the author of three well-respected texts in the realm of constitutional law, Lively is clearly qualified to prepare this book on Supreme Court dissenting opinions. The book is clearly written and up to date. Advanced undergraduate through faculty.?-Choice
?Author Lively analyzes how dissenting opinions in the Supreme Court contributed to the development of basic rights and liberties. . . . He draws clear lessons for contemporary debate on constitutional rights and protections.?-Legal information Alert
"Author Lively analyzes how dissenting opinions in the Supreme Court contributed to the development of basic rights and liberties. . . . He draws clear lessons for contemporary debate on constitutional rights and protections."-Legal information Alert
"As a law professor and as the author of three well-respected texts in the realm of constitutional law, Lively is clearly qualified to prepare this book on Supreme Court dissenting opinions. The book is clearly written and up to date. Advanced undergraduate through faculty."-Choice
About the Author
DONALD E. LIVELY is a Professor of Law at the University of Toledo College of Law. He is the author of Modern Communications Law (Praeger, 1991), Essential Principles of Communications Law (Praeger, 1991), and The Constitution and Race (Praeger, 1992).