About this item
Highlights
- Thomas Eisele explores the premise that the Socratic method of inquiry need not teach only negative lessons (showing us what we do not know, but not what we do know).
- About the Author: Thomas D. Eisele is professor of law at the University of Cincinnati College of Law.
- 368 Pages
- Philosophy, History & Surveys
Description
About the Book
Bitter Knowledge examines the Socratic method in three fundamental Platonic dialogues, Protagoras, Meno, and Theaetetus, contending that the method is really a cyclical one of disillusionment and renewal.
Book Synopsis
Thomas Eisele explores the premise that the Socratic method of inquiry need not teach only negative lessons (showing us what we do not know, but not what we do know). Instead, Eisele contends, the Socratic method is cyclical: we start negatively by recognizing our illusions, but end positively through a process of recollection performed in response to our disillusionment, which ultimately leads to renewal. Thus, a positive lesson about our resources as philosophical investigators, as students and teachers, becomes available to participants in Socrates' robust conversational inquiry.
Bitter Knowledge includes Eisele's detailed readings of Socrates' teaching techniques in three fundamental Platonic dialogues, Protagoras, Meno, and Theaetetus, as well as his engagement with contemporary authorities such as Gregory Vlastos, Martha Nussbaum, and Stanley Cavell. Written in a highly engaging and accessible style, this book will appeal to students and scholars in philosophy, classics, law, rhetoric, and education.
Review Quotes
"Eisele's book is much more than an erudite, seductive, and imaginative exploration of three central Platonic dialogues. It is also a fine general treatment of philosophy, discussing the kind of finality or closure to which philosophical questions are susceptible and the appropriate stance of the inquirer. It considers the pedagogy of philosophy and law brilliantly." --Thomas Morawetz, University of Connecticut School of Law
"This book is original, fresh, and of very high quality, opening up these Platonic texts, central to Western culture, in new ways. In addition, it establishes a method that others can use and apply to the other dialogues. It would be a wonderful text to assign in courses in philosophy, basic humanities, education, and law." --James Boyd White, University of Michigan
"Eisele has a gift for telling stories. In this book, he spins a narrative of disillusion and renewal around a figure of Socrates familiar to those who have read Plato's dialogues and studied the literature launched by Gregory Vlastos and elevated by Alexander Nehamas, Myles Burnyeat, and others. Informed as his book is by philosophers specializing in ancient Greek philosophy, Eisele's real inspiration is the ordinary language philosophy of Stanley Cavell and the refrain 'must we mean what we say.'" --Choice
"Thomas Eisele's captivating book, Bitter Knowledge, raises the debate over the law school model of Socratic teaching to an unprecedented level of philosophical sophistication. . . . Eisele conducts a careful analysis of four key dialogues of Plato that together offer a vivid literary portrait of the character of Socrates and his philosophical method. The result is a work at once rich in philosophic insight and provocative in its investigation of the method of American law teaching and its relationship with Socrates, the philosopher." --Journal of Legal Education
"Through his thoughtful and incisive readings of Plato, Thomas Eisele puts Socrates in a new light. In Eisele's hands, Socrates offers us a method not simply for philosophy but for the challenges of life and mind. This superb book builds on the great readings of Plato, adding to the richness of our understanding of the enigmatic figure of Socrates. These are profound readings of Plato." --Dennis Patterson, Rutgers University School of Law
About the Author
Thomas D. Eisele is professor of law at the University of Cincinnati College of Law.
